| Pos | Team | Pld | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | • | Pembroke | 18 | 43 |
| 2 | • | Monkstown | 18 | 38 |
| 3 | • | TRR | 18 | 35 |
| 4 | • | UCD | 18 | 34 |
| 5 | • | Corinthian | 18 | 29 |
| 6 | • | Railway Union | 18 | 28 |
| 7 | • | YMCA | 18 | 24 |
| 8 | • | Glenanne | 18 | 14 |
| 9 | • | Fingal | 18 | 13 |
| 10 | • | Avoca | 18 | 2 |
| Pos | Team | Pld | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | • | UCD | 18 | 43 |
| 2 | • | Loreto | 18 | 42 |
| 3 | • | Railway Union | 18 | 40 |
| 4 | • | Hermes | 18 | 36 |
| 5 | • | Old Alex | 18 | 34 |
| 6 | • | Pembroke | 18 | 16 |
| 7 | ↑ | Glenanne | 18 | 14 |
| 8 | ↓ | Corinthian | 18 | 11 |
| 9 | • | North Kildare | 18 | 11 |
| 10 | • | Trinity College | 18 | 7 |
| Pos | Team | Pld | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | • | Rathgar | 15 | 37 |
| 2 | • | Clontarf | 15 | 24 |
| 3 | • | Suttonians | 15 | 22 |
| 4 | • | Dublin University | 15 | 19 |
| 5 | • | Kilkenny | 15 | 15 |
| 6 | • | Weston | 15 | 10 |
| Pos | Team | Pld | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | • | Loreto II | 18 | 44 |
| 2 | • | Pembroke II | 18 | 41 |
| 3 | • | Genesis | 18 | 32 |
| 4 | • | Old Alex II | 18 | 30 |
| 5 | • | Three Rock | 18 | 27 |
| 6 | • | Hermes II | 18 | 25 |
| 7 | • | Railway Union II | 18 | 19 |
| 8 | • | Trinity II | 18 | 13 |
| 9 | • | Bray | 18 | 10 |
| 10 | • | Newbridge | 18 | 7 |
June 22, 2012 10:21 am
euro_hockey says
I find it fascinating that Irish clubs believe they have the divine right to be in the EHL, the ranking system has been in place for years and hasnt changed in relation to the mens EHL. For Quins and Irish hockey to think that after Cookstown and Bann getting thumped in the EHL that their ranking would not go down. Also dont be so disrespectful to other nations for doing well at different tournaments
June 22, 2012 12:09 pm
blimp says
Quins thought they were going to EHL, were excited, found out they weren’t, and are disappointed. How is that being disrespectful?
Cookstown had a tough time, but Banbridge only lost 5-3 to UHC. 4-3 to Montrogue, where is the thumping there?
Scotland go from 1 Trophy team, 0 EHL teams to 2 EHL teams, due to goal difference. They benefit from having only one team in the Trophy, the next SCO team is 3rd Tier.
Do you actually think that is a fair situation? That Kelburne came second at the EuroHockey Trophy and has earned 2 spots in the EHL? Meaning the second Scottish team, goes form 3rd tier to 1st. Fair enough Kelburne has earned the right to represent in the EHL, but gaining 2 spots is not right.
June 22, 2012 2:05 pm
League Statto says
Steve
I see there is once again only 7 teams in Div 2. Mullingar obviously dropping back down and being replace by Kilkenny. Has this been confirmed? What division have Mullingar gone back to?
Another year with 7 teams in a league. This is the 3rd year in a row with this fiasco and the 4th or 5th year that there has been issues with Div 2. At what point will something be done about this by the branch? Something tangible has to be done. Its a joke!
June 22, 2012 2:12 pm
Stephen Findlater says
On the provisional fixture list, Mullingar have gone back into division four. I’ll be putting together a post about the men’s leagues this evening once I’ve updated all the provisional fixtures
June 22, 2012 5:27 pm
AG says
@euro_hockey
There’s no sense of entitlement to be in the EHL. I doubt most people have any problem with Scotland earning more ranking points than Ireland to get above us; the points from the EHL/Trophy are weighted accordingly.
The issue is that it has come down to goal difference when Kelburne were playing against clubs from middling nations (Italy, Wales and Austria) whereas Cookstown and Bann had to play the likes of Amsterdam and UHC respectively. It’s not comparing like with like.
In the event of a tie on overall points, would probably be fairer to decide it on the “points per entry” field from the previous season. In this case, it would still put Scotland ahead of Ireland but would be a bit easier to accept.
June 22, 2012 6:14 pm
euro_hockey says
First of all I am not from Scotland and am not supporting their cause. I agree the current rules need changing as they had not thought through the scenario that has arisen.
What I am commenting about is the way the article is written and it does come across as arrogant.
Quins thought they were there, if they put their head in the sand fair enough!! They obviously had not looked at the ranking points after R1 of EHL. If they had they would of seen it was going to be tight based on the Trophy results.
June 22, 2012 6:37 pm
Paddy Power says
Ultimately, this has been on the cards for a few years. Knock on effect of players from Ireland playing their club hockey abroad thus weakening their club side in Ireland and therefore making it difficult for that club side to make any progress in EHL. I doubt any club side in Ireland even at their peak would have got out of Cookstown’s group. It is where it is for a reason and won’t change until the overall quality in Ireland rises again, be it from players returning from abroad or the club sides at home getting better.
June 22, 2012 9:06 pm
AG says
@euro_hockey
You’re entitled to your interpretation of the piece but the way the article is written has nothing to do with Quins. They knew this was a possibility but opted to start preparing for the EHL on and off the pitch, rather than wait for the rankings to come out and have lost a month of prep time. I’m sure you can appreciate their sense of disappointment that it came down to such fine margins in the end.