| Pos | Team | Pld | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | • | Monkstown | 10 | 25 |
| 2 | • | Pembroke | 10 | 23 |
| 3 | • | Glenanne | 10 | 20 |
| 4 | • | YMCA | 10 | 18 |
| 5 | • | Railway Union | 10 | 16 |
| 6 | • | Corinthian | 10 | 12 |
| 7 | • | TRR | 10 | 11 |
| 8 | • | UCD | 10 | 7 |
| 9 | • | Fingal | 10 | 7 |
| 10 | • | Clontarf | 10 | 1 |
| Pos | Team | Pld | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ↑ | Railway Union | 11 | 27 |
| 2 | ↓ | UCD | 10 | 25 |
| 3 | • | Loreto | 10 | 23 |
| 4 | • | Hermes | 11 | 19 |
| 5 | • | Old Alex | 10 | 18 |
| 6 | • | Trinity College | 11 | 13 |
| 7 | • | Corinthian | 10 | 8 |
| 8 | • | Pembroke | 11 | 7 |
| 9 | • | Glenanne | 11 | 6 |
| 10 | • | TRL | 11 | 4 |
| Pos | Team | Pld | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | • | Avoca | 11 | 22 |
| 2 | • | Suttonians | 11 | 22 |
| 3 | • | Dublin University | 11 | 18 |
| 4 | • | Weston | 10 | 17 |
| 5 | • | Rathgar | 12 | 15 |
| 6 | • | Portrane | 10 | 14 |
| 7 | • | Mullingar | 11 | 3 |
| Pos | Team | Pld | Pts | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ↑ | Loreto II | 12 | 29 |
| 2 | ↓ | Pembroke II | 12 | 29 |
| 3 | • | North Kildare | 11 | 22 |
| 4 | • | Railway Union II | 12 | 20 |
| 5 | • | Old Alex II | 11 | 17 |
| 6 | • | Hermes II | 12 | 16 |
| 7 | • | Newbridge | 12 | 14 |
| 8 | • | Genesis | 12 | 10 |
| 9 | • | UCD II | 12 | 8 |
| 10 | • | Corinthian II | 12 | 1 |
June 18, 2010 1:23 pm
Edward Nigma says
Anyone want to comment?
June 18, 2010 4:45 pm
Mr Mysterious says
Ah E. Nigma, how's tricks??Enjoying the summer break?Findo – just wondering if you've heard anything concrete, or even more like wet cement, about league restructuring from the Branch?? Thanks,Mr. M.???
June 18, 2010 5:11 pm
Stephen Findlater says
From my understanding, Men's division one and two will stay as they are for the upcoming year. A couple of proposals were put forward for discussion at the recent Leinster Branch meeting but things will stay as is for the moment.If you have any formal proposal or idea, the next Branch meeting is before the start of the 2010/11 season and is the next forum to raise the issue if you feel you have a worthwhile, formal proposal.
June 19, 2010 10:25 am
Mr. Dublin says
I think that both the mens and the ladies should be run off the same principle.In the ladies div 2 , 2nd teams can play in the division but cant get promoted to div 1. The highest place 1st team would be giving the opportunity to play off to get into div 1 whether they came 1st or 10th.This has brought the ladies side on and made it more competitive.I think that there would be a need to get the top 3 from div 2 to stay in the division along with the top 5-7 from div 3. There has being a few discussions on whether a div 2 team would match a div 3 side so why not try it and let the div 2 teams step up to the mark The teams that are left from div 2 and 3 then get re-structured down the leagues into the new div 3 and so onComments????
June 19, 2010 3:44 pm
Mr Mysterious says
Mr. Dublin,I was speaking to a Div 2 player recently and he mentioned talk of a reshuffle with the top halves of Div 2 & 3 becoming a new Div 2 and the bottom halves of each league becoming the new Div 3. That was the reason I queried it with Stephen.I agree with just the non-2nd sides being the only ones allowed to go up to Div 1 but I definitely think it would be beneficial to have a different structure to the one currently in place. The current men's Div 2 resembles the Scottish Premier League, playing each other 3 times and is a bit of a joke but only in terms of set-up, I'm not talking about standard of play. Fleshing out the league by promoting a few struggling smaller clubs back up to Div 2 is not the answer to the problem either though.I believe that creating a new structure and having what might be perceived as the smaller clubs in Leinster playing against teams with Div 1 squad players & ex-Div 1 experienced players on a regular basis can only benefit these clubs. Particularly the ones who do get promoted to Div 1.The current gulf in standards between Div 1 & 2 usually means the promoted side are on a hiding to nothing when they go up.It's just a vicious circle and needs to be stopped as it's not beneficial to anyone.Regards,Mr. M.???
June 22, 2010 12:56 am
Jessie says
Totally irrelevant to the above and the article, has anyone heard about a restructuring of the U-21 and Senior Interpro's? Something about extending women's U-21 to U-23. Any wisdom Findo? Or is this complete hearsay?
June 22, 2010 2:09 pm
Stephen Findlater says
Jessie, have not heard anything about that at all. For the Junior Celtic Cup, Ireland A is competing as an U-21 team but beyond that I don't know of any changes. If anyone knows anything more, drop me an email at stevie_findlats@yahoo.com